A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving future neighbours around the development of a wall in a coastal web-site in the north Dublin suburb, a case which includes attracted countrywide awareness adhering to an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed spouse and children home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental considerations, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, request to create their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such spots are topic to rigorous controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly within a delicate coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are each very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior drinking water through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods, an image which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is really a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and problems attached towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have explained their long-standing link to the region and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple simply just wanting to build a relatives home in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed based on Qualified information and authorized strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as coming into The ocean through a storm, do not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier observed that the businessman had Earlier been associated with local advocacy on preparing and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly distinct Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to establish if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another very long following the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it can finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the court’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most closely watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.